Current:Home > FinanceSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -GrowthSphere Strategies
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-17 12:40:31
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (93)
Related
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- 1 dead,14 injured after driver crashes into New Mexico store
- Investigators continue piecing together Charlotte shooting that killed 4 officers
- Lawmakers want the Chiefs and Royals to come to Kansas, but a stadium plan fizzled
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Live Nation's Concert Week is here: How to get $25 tickets to hundreds of concerts
- The Best Spring Jackets That Are Comfy, Cute, and Literally Go With Everything
- 'An Officer and a Gentleman' actor Louis Gossett Jr.'s cause of death revealed
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Ryan Gosling and Mikey Day reprise viral Beavis and Butt-Head characters at ‘Fall Guy’ premiere
Ranking
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Wisconsin school district says person it called active shooter ‘neutralized’ outside middle school
- Former USWNT star Carli Lloyd pregnant with her first child
- Charges revealed against former Trump chief of staff in Arizona fake elector case
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Kaia Gerber and Austin Butler Get Cozy During Rare Date Night
- Why Jon Bon Jovi Admits He “Got Away With Murder” While Married to Wife Dorothea Bongiovi
- US has long history of college protests: Here's what happened in the past
Recommendation
Sam Taylor
E. coli outbreak: Walnuts sold in at least 19 states linked to illnesses in California and Washington
Kentucky Derby's legendary races never get old: seven to watch again and again
Bounce house swept up by wind kills one child and injures another
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Sofía Vergara Candidly Shares How She Feels About Aging
South Carolina Senate takes up ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors
Kansas legislators expect Kelly to veto their latest tax cuts and call a special session